Charta is on Google Play: practise on the go. Get the app
Charta

Work out the effective, statutory and cash rates of tax and contrast them

CFA® Level I · Financial Statement Analysis · Analysis of Income Taxes · FSA.9.d

The idea

Three tax rates tell different stories. The statutory rate is the rate set in law. The effective tax rate is income tax expense divided by pre-tax income, and it departs from the statutory rate because of foreign earnings taxed at different rates, tax-exempt income, credits and non-deductible expenses; the reconciliation in the tax note explains each difference. The cash tax rate is cash taxes paid divided by pre-tax income, and it differs from the effective rate because of deferred taxes: accelerated tax depreciation, for instance, pushes cash taxes below the expense and builds a deferred tax liability. For forecasting, the analyst asks which differences will persist. A low effective rate driven by a one-off credit should not be projected forward, and a cash rate persistently below the effective rate may reverse if investment slows.

A practice question

From the question bank, with the reason each wrong option is wrong.

A company's effective tax rate is calculated as:

  1. cash taxes paid / pre-tax incomeWhy not: That is the cash tax rate, which differs whenever deferred taxes change.
  2. income tax expense / net incomeWhy not: Uses post-tax income as the base, which overstates the rate.
  3. income tax expense / pre-tax income — correct

The effective rate relates the tax expense on the income statement to pre-tax income; comparing it with the statutory rate shows the effect of permanent differences and foreign rates.

A harder one

A company reports pre-tax income of 800, income tax expense of 200 and cash taxes paid of 160. Its cash tax rate is:

  1. 25.0%Why not: Uses the tax expense (200 / 800), which is the effective rate.
  2. 20.0% — correct
  3. 80.0%Why not: Divides cash taxes by tax expense instead of by pre-tax income.

Cash tax rate = cash taxes paid / pre-tax income = 160 / 800 = 20.0%.

The hardest tier

A company's cash tax rate has been well below its effective tax rate for several years because of accelerated tax depreciation. The most appropriate conclusion is that:

  1. a deferred tax liability is growing — correct
  2. a deferred tax asset is growingWhy not: Gets the direction wrong. Paying less tax now than expensed means tax is owed later, a liability.
  3. the gap is certain to persistWhy not: It persists only while investment keeps growing. If capital spending slows, the difference reverses.

Cash tax below tax expense means the difference is being deferred, building a deferred tax liability. The analyst should ask whether investment will continue at a pace that keeps the gap open.

In the app: 6 practice questions on this outcome, a narrated walkthrough with diagrams, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.

Take the free diagnostic →

More in Analysis of Income Taxes