Set out the three standard ways a performance-based fee can be structured
The idea
The first form is symmetrical, sometimes called a fulcrum fee: the fee rises with outperformance and falls by the same proportion with underperformance around a base level, so manager and client share upside and downside alike. The second is a bonus structure: a base fee plus a share of any positive excess return, with no penalty for underperformance, which creates an option-like payoff and an incentive to raise risk. The third is a bonus with a high-water mark: the bonus is paid only once the manager has recovered earlier shortfalls, so the client does not pay twice for the same gains. Caps, floors and hurdle rates can be added to any of the three to limit extreme outcomes.
In the app: 1 practice questions on this outcome, a narrated walkthrough with diagrams, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.
Take the free diagnostic →More in Investment Manager Selection
- Set out the stages of the manager selection process, with due diligence among them
- Distinguish Type I from Type II errors when deciding whether to hire or keep a manager
- Explain how style analysis, both holdings-based and returns-based, supports the choice of investment managers
- Explain how maximum drawdown, drawdown duration, capture ratios on the upside and downside, and up/down capture help in assessing managers
- Assess the investment philosophy of a manager and the process by which it reaches investment decisions
- Discuss how behavioural factors shape the decisions of an investment team and propose ways to limit their influence
- Weigh the benefits and costs of separate accounts against those of pooled investment vehicles
- Contrast the main forms of investment manager contract, covering their key provisions and their advantages and drawbacks
- Analyse an illustrative performance-based fee schedule and interpret its outcomes