Analyse an asset allocation and its construction against the portfolio's return and risk targets and cash needs, and propose actions to close any gaps
The idea
For an endowment, the required return is typically the spending rate plus expected inflation plus costs. With 4% spending, 2.5% inflation and 0.5% costs, the multiplicative target is 1.04 × 1.025 × 1.005 − 1 ≈ 7.1% (the additive shortcut gives 7.0%). The analysis checks whether the allocation's expected return meets this at acceptable risk, whether liquid assets cover several years of spending plus expected capital calls under stress, and whether illiquid holdings sit within policy limits. Remedies include slowing commitment pacing, raising liquid reserves, arranging a credit line, adopting a smoothed spending rule or rebalancing with overlays. A strong recommendation quantifies each gap and explains the trade-off between return, liquidity and fairness between current and future generations of beneficiaries.
In the app: 2 practice questions on this outcome, a narrated walkthrough with diagrams, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.
Take the free diagnostic →More in Case Study in Portfolio Management: Institutional (Endowment)
- Explain the tools available to manage liquidity risk in a portfolio
- Explain how an investor with a long horizon can harvest the illiquidity premium over time
- Apply the CFA Institute Code and Standards to the conduct of people who choose external managers
- Weigh derivatives against physical (cash market) trades as ways to set or change asset class and risk exposures, in terms of costs and benefits
- Show how derivatives overlays can implement tactical allocation shifts and portfolio rebalancing
- Explain how ESG factors enter the management of long-horizon institutional portfolios