Weigh the return potential and risks of private versus public market exposure within a long-term strategic allocation
The idea
Private markets can add an illiquidity premium, returns from manager skill and access to companies that are not listed. The costs are illiquidity, uncertain timing of capital calls and distributions, leverage, concentration and valuation lag. Manager returns are widely dispersed, so the choice of manager matters more than in public markets. Reported volatility and correlations are smoothed, so unsmooth them before any mean-variance optimisation, or the model will overweight private assets. Size the illiquid sleeve against the client's liquidity needs, then reach and hold the target through commitment pacing across vintages. A good recommendation also covers the denominator effect: when public markets fall, the private share rises above target, and rebalancing is slow and costly.
In the app: 2 practice questions on this outcome, a narrated walkthrough with diagrams, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.
Take the free diagnostic →More in Private Investments and Structures
- Distinguish private investments from listed ones by their features, and explain how the two kinds of market differ in character
- Explain the ways of investing privately and the vehicles used, and when each one suits an investor
- Explain why private-market results cannot be read like listed-market returns, and compute and interpret the paid-in multiples DPI, RVPI and TVPI and when each is useful