Contrast indexes weighted by price with those weighted by market capitalisation
The idea
An index is defined by its weighting scheme, and the scheme decides what the number means. A price-weighted index adds share prices and divides by a divisor, so a high-priced share sways it regardless of the company's size — and every split forces the divisor to be reset. A market-capitalisation-weighted index weights by value, which matches what an investor holding the whole market would own, but tilts toward whatever has already risen. An equal-weighted index gives every constituent the same say, which tilts toward smaller companies and needs constant rebalancing to stay equal. None is neutral: choosing an index is choosing a view about what should count.
Formulas
Price-weighted index
index = Σ Pᵢ ÷ d
- Pᵢ
- the price of one share of each member
- d
- the divisor, reset on splits and on changes of membership
One share of each, so a high-priced company moves the index more than a large one. The divisor exists only to stop a split changing the level, and it drifts away from the number of members over time.
Weight in a market-capitalisation-weighted index
wᵢ = MVᵢ ÷ Σ MV
- MVᵢ
- the market value of a member — its price × its shares outstanding
- Σ MV
- the market values of every member added together
Weights move with prices, so the index rebalances itself and a risen company takes a larger share. Float-adjusted versions count only the shares actually available to buy.
A practice question
A price-weighted index gives the greatest influence to the constituent with the highest:
- share price — correct
- market capitalisationWhy not: That is the capitalisation-weighted scheme. A price-weighted index never looks at shares outstanding, so a small company with an expensive share can dominate it.
- revenueWhy not: No common index weights by revenue. Fundamental schemes use measures such as sales or book value, but a price-weighted index sums prices and nothing else.
It sums prices, so a share priced at 500 moves the index ten times as much as one priced at 50.
A harder one
Three shares are priced at $10, $20 and $60. In a price-weighted index their weights are closest to:
- 33% eachWhy not: That is the equal-weighted answer. A price-weighted index divides each price by the total of 90, which is nowhere near equal.
- 11%, 22% and 67% — correct
- equal to their market valuesWhy not: Market values need shares outstanding, which the question never gives. Price weighting ignores them by construction.
The prices total 90, so the weights are 10/90, 20/90 and 60/90 regardless of how big the companies are.
The hardest tier
A price-weighted index rises 2% while a capitalisation-weighted index of the same shares falls 1%. The most likely explanation is that:
- one index has more constituentsWhy not: The question states that both cover the same shares, so membership cannot be the difference.
- dividends were excluded from oneWhy not: A dividend difference would be a small, one-directional gap, not a reversal of sign over the same shares.
- high-priced but smaller companies outperformed — correct
The two schemes disagree exactly when price and size point in different directions.
In the app: 21 practice questions on this outcome, a narrated walkthrough with diagrams, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.
Take the free diagnostic →More in Equity Issuance and Trading
- Set out the choices made when building an index
- Explain how indexes are rebalanced and reconstituted
- Explain what security market indexes are used for
- Contrast equity trading on an exchange, off an exchange and over the counter
- Work out average daily volume and float, and explain how liquidity is measured
- Explain the secondary and primary markets for equity and the role each plays