Explain what to consider about post-employment benefits when modelling and valuing a company
The idea
Analysts treat a pension deficit as debt-like and a surplus as an asset, usually after tax, when measuring leverage and enterprise value. For comparability, only service cost belongs in operating cost; interest cost is financing expense and, under US GAAP, the expected return is a non-operating item that depends on an assumption management chooses. If the employer contributes more than total pension cost, the excess is economically a repayment of borrowing, so it can be reclassified from operating to financing cash flow, raising operating cash flow. Forecasts should flex the discount rate, salary growth and return assumptions, since a lower discount rate raises the obligation and service cost. The trap is treating a high expected return as real operating profit.
In the app: 3 practice questions on this outcome, a narrated walkthrough with diagrams, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.
Take the free diagnostic →More in Employee Compensation: Post-Employment and Share-Based
- Contrast the different forms of pay given to employees
- Explain the effect of share-based compensation on the financial statements
- Explain how a financial statement model projects share-based compensation expense and share count, and how these feed into valuation
- Explain the effect of post-employment benefits on the financial statements