Show how a financial statement analysis framework is applied to a specific problem, question or purpose (for example, valuing equity against comparables, critiquing a credit rating, getting a full view of financial leverage, or assessing the views in management's discussion of results)
The idea
A disciplined analysis follows six steps. State the purpose and context: what question, for whom and by when. Collect data from filings, industry sources and management. Process it: adjust statements, build common-size figures and ratios. Analyse and interpret, for example with a DuPont decomposition where ROE equals tax burden × interest burden × EBIT margin × asset turnover × leverage, or by separating equity-method income from core results. Develop and communicate conclusions and recommendations. Follow up as new information arrives. The framework keeps the work tied to the decision, whether valuing equity on comparables, testing a credit rating or judging leverage. The trap is producing ratios without asking which of them answer the question actually posed.
In the app: 2 practice questions on this outcome, a narrated walkthrough with diagrams, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.
Take the free diagnostic →More in Integration of Financial Statement Analysis Techniques
- Identify the reporting choices and biases that make companies' financial statements less reliable and harder to compare, and explain how such biases can sway financial decisions
- Assess how good a company's financial figures are and propose adjustments that make them more reliable and comparable with peers, including adjustments for differing accounting standards, methods and assumptions
- Assess the effect on financial statements and ratios of a particular change in accounting standards, methods or assumptions
- Analyse and explain the effect of balance sheet adjustments, normalised earnings and cash flow statement adjustments on a company's financial statements, ratios and overall financial condition