Assess how good a company's financial figures are and propose adjustments that make them more reliable and comparable with peers, including adjustments for differing accounting standards, methods and assumptions
The idea
Adjustments put companies on the same footing. To compare a US GAAP LIFO company with a FIFO peer, add the LIFO reserve to inventory, add the reserve times one minus the tax rate to equity and the rest to deferred tax, and adjust cost of sales by the change in the reserve. Remove goodwill when comparing tangible returns; add capitalised interest back to interest expense for coverage; treat pension deficits and other debt-like items as debt; restate a company that capitalises development costs to expense them if its peer does. Each adjustment should keep the balance sheet in balance and apply tax where relevant. The trap is adjusting one side of the statements and forgetting the other.
In the app: 3 practice questions on this outcome, a narrated walkthrough with diagrams, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.
Take the free diagnostic →More in Integration of Financial Statement Analysis Techniques
- Show how a financial statement analysis framework is applied to a specific problem, question or purpose (for example, valuing equity against comparables, critiquing a credit rating, getting a full view of financial leverage, or assessing the views in management's discussion of results)
- Identify the reporting choices and biases that make companies' financial statements less reliable and harder to compare, and explain how such biases can sway financial decisions
- Assess the effect on financial statements and ratios of a particular change in accounting standards, methods or assumptions
- Analyse and explain the effect of balance sheet adjustments, normalised earnings and cash flow statement adjustments on a company's financial statements, ratios and overall financial condition