Contrast alternative assets with bonds as ways to reduce the risk of holding equities
The idea
Government bonds have traditionally cushioned equity falls with low or negative correlation, high liquidity and low cost, which makes them the default risk mitigator. They work less well when inflation drives the sell-off, because rising yields then hurt stocks and bonds together, and when yields are already low, limiting upside. Some alternatives, such as macro or tail-risk hedge funds, commodities and real assets, may protect better in those inflationary regimes. However, alternatives cost more, are less liquid, depend heavily on manager selection and often show smoothed returns that exaggerate their stability. A recommendation should weigh the expected inflation regime, liquidity needs and fees. The trap is assuming all alternatives mitigate equity risk; private equity largely adds more of it.
In the app: 1 practice questions on this outcome, a narrated walkthrough with diagrams, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.
Take the free diagnostic →More in Asset Allocation to Alternative Investments
- Explain what alternative investments contribute within a portfolio spanning several asset classes
- Contrast defining the opportunity set by traditional asset classes with defining it by risk factors, when alternatives are included
- Discuss what investors should assess when allocating to each kind of alternative investment
- Discuss how to judge whether alternative investments suit a given investor
- Discuss the methods available for setting the weight of alternatives in an asset allocation
- Explain why planning for liquidity is central when committing money to alternatives
- Discuss what to watch when overseeing an alternatives programme after it is in place