Discuss the methods available for setting the weight of alternatives in an asset allocation
The idea
Options range from simple to model-driven. Some investors hold none because of size, governance or liquidity limits. Heuristics, such as copying peer allocations or using a rule of thumb, are easy but ignore the investor's circumstances. Mean–variance optimisation can include alternatives, but inputs must be adjusted: unsmooth appraisal-based returns, include illiquidity, and cap allocations, since otherwise the optimiser overweights assets with understated risk. Monte Carlo simulation is well suited because it can model fat tails, spending, capital calls and distributions over many paths and show the probability of meeting goals. Risk-factor-based optimisation targets exposures to underlying factors and reveals overlaps with equities. Traps include feeding unadjusted private market data into optimisers.
In the app: 1 practice questions on this outcome, a narrated walkthrough with diagrams, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.
Take the free diagnostic →More in Asset Allocation to Alternative Investments
- Explain what alternative investments contribute within a portfolio spanning several asset classes
- Contrast alternative assets with bonds as ways to reduce the risk of holding equities
- Contrast defining the opportunity set by traditional asset classes with defining it by risk factors, when alternatives are included
- Discuss what investors should assess when allocating to each kind of alternative investment
- Discuss how to judge whether alternative investments suit a given investor
- Explain why planning for liquidity is central when committing money to alternatives
- Discuss what to watch when overseeing an alternatives programme after it is in place