Contrast approaches to one liability with approaches to a schedule of liabilities, and the different ways each can be implemented
The idea
For one liability, immunisation matches Macaulay duration to the horizon. For several liabilities: Cash flow matching buys bonds whose coupons and principal cover each payment; it is safe but costly and inflexible. Duration matching needs asset present value at least equal to liability present value, equal money duration (basis point value), and asset convexity above liability convexity but no higher than necessary. Horizon matching combines the two: cash flow matching for near payments, duration matching for distant ones. Receive-fixed swaps or bond futures can close a duration gap without selling assets. Contingent immunisation lets a manager run an active strategy until the surplus falls to a floor, then immunise. The trap is matching duration alone and ignoring curve twists.
In the app: 2 practice questions on this outcome, a narrated walkthrough with diagrams, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.
Take the free diagnostic →More in Liability-Driven and Index-Based Strategies
- Assess ways of funding one future liability with a bond portfolio
- Assess liability-driven strategies across a range of interest rate scenarios and choose the one that best meets the portfolio's goals
- Explain what can go wrong when a portfolio is managed against a set of liabilities
- Explain how bond indexes are built and why managing a portfolio to track one is hard
- Contrast the ways an investor can take on passive exposure to bond markets
- Set out what makes a sound benchmark and defend the choice of a particular benchmark