Charta is on Google Play: practise on the go. Get the app
Charta

Relate a nation's risk exposure to its rates of economic growth, its political risk, its legal risk and the structure of its economy.

FRM® Part I · Valuation and Risk Models · Country Risk: Determinants, Measures, and Implications · FRM1.VR.5.a

The idea

A country's risk exposure comes from four linked sources. The first is growth. Young economies can grow fast, but with volatile growth and thinner institutions, while mature economies grow slowly and steadily, so the growth stage affects the size and stability of cash flows. Political risk covers continuity risk and discontinuity risk. Continuity risk is that governments and policies change within the system, for example tax and regulatory shifts. Discontinuity risk is expropriation, nationalization, war and violence. Corruption also counts, because it acts like an extra tax and adds uncertainty. Legal risk is not what the statute book says but whether contracts and property rights are actually enforced by an independent, predictable judiciary. Economic structure matters because an economy or tax base concentrated in one commodity, sector or buyer suffers one shock all at once, while a diversified one absorbs it. The usual error is judging a country on growth alone. Match each description to its risk type.

A practice question

From the question bank, with the reason each wrong option is wrong.

A government earns most of its revenue from taxes and royalties on a single exported commodity, and the commodity's price has just fallen sharply. Which source of country risk does this mainly illustrate?

  1. Economic structure risk - correct
  2. Legal riskWhy not: Legal risk concerns enforcement of contracts and property rights; the stem describes dependence on one revenue source, not a court problem.
  3. Political discontinuity riskWhy not: Discontinuity risk means abrupt regime change, expropriation or war; the stem describes concentration of the economy, not a political event.
  4. Life-cycle risk of a young economyWhy not: Growth-stage risk concerns how young and volatile the economy is; the issue here is concentration of revenue in one commodity.

Dependence of exports and tax revenue on one commodity is a feature of the economy's structure: a single price shock hits the whole economy and the budget together. Diversified economies absorb such shocks better, so concentration raises country risk.

A harder one

An analyst compares a young, rapidly industrializing economy with a mature, slow-growing one. Which statement best relates growth to risk exposure?

  1. The young economy is less risky because faster growth produces more cash flow to cover obligations in every scenarioWhy not: Treats high growth as risk reducing and ignores that growth in young economies is volatile and institutions are thinner.
  2. The young economy offers faster but more volatile growth with weaker institutions, so its exposure tends to be higher - correct
  3. The mature economy is riskier because low growth leaves it fragile in every scenario, whatever its institutionsWhy not: Equates low growth with high risk; mature economies usually have stable growth and established institutions.
  4. Growth is irrelevant to country risk, which depends only on political and legal factorsWhy not: Leaves out growth and economic structure, which are two of the four determinants of country risk.

Growth stage matters for both level and stability: young economies grow faster but with larger swings and weaker institutions, so exposure is generally higher. Growth is one of four determinants alongside political risk, legal risk and economic structure.

The hardest tier

A country has a modern commercial code, but commercial disputes take about six years, judges are appointed and removed by the executive, and officials routinely demand payments for licences. Which assessment is most accurate for a foreign investor?

  1. Legal risk is low because a modern commercial code exists, and the payments are only a minor operating cost that firms absorbWhy not: Confuses laws on paper with enforcement; ignores that delays and a dependent judiciary make rights hard to protect.
  2. Legal risk is low and political risk is high, because the executive's control of judges is purely a political matter with no effect on contract enforcementWhy not: Separates the judiciary's lack of independence from legal risk, although it directly undermines enforcement of contracts.
  3. Legal risk is high despite good laws, because enforcement and judicial independence are weak; payments add corruption risk, acting like a tax - correct
  4. Risk is not affected because corruption and delays are certain, so they can be priced as a known fixed cost without any extra returnWhy not: Corruption and enforcement failures are uncertain and can escalate; treating them as a fixed known cost ignores the added risk.

Legal risk is measured by enforcement and independence, not by statute. Six-year disputes and executive-controlled judges make legal risk high. Bribe demands are corruption, a political risk that acts as a tax and adds uncertainty.

In the app: 6 practice questions on this outcome, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.

Start free →

More in Country Risk: Determinants, Measures, and Implications