Charta is on Google Play: practise on the go. Get the app
Charta

Outline the different kinds of credit enhancement and weigh them up.

FRM® Part II · Credit Risk Measurement and Management · An Introduction to Securitisation · FRM2.CR.23.e

The idea

Credit enhancement is any feature that raises the credit quality of a tranche above that of the pool. Internal enhancement comes from within the structure. It includes subordination, where junior tranches absorb losses first, and over-collateralization, where assets exceed notes. It also includes excess spread, which is the pool's weighted average coupon minus note coupons and fees, and reserve or cash collateral accounts. External enhancement comes from third parties, such as monoline insurance or financial guarantees, letters of credit, and guarantees from the originator or parent. Weigh them by cost and risk. Subordination and over-collateralization are reliable but reduce the proceeds the originator can raise. Excess spread is free at closing but varies with prepayments and defaults. Reserve accounts cost carry. External support adds counterparty risk, because a downgrade of the provider can pull down the tranche. The exam point is the internal versus external split and the counterparty risk of external support.

Formulas

Credit enhancement of the senior notes

senior CE = (subordination + OC) ÷ pool

subordination
the balance of all notes junior to the senior
OC
collateral minus total notes
pool
the collateral balance

Count both cushions and divide by the pool, not by the senior balance.

Annual excess spread in money

excess spread = WAC × pool − Σ note coupon × note balance − fees

WAC
the pool's weighted average coupon
pool
the collateral balance
note coupon
each note's coupon rate
note balance
each note's balance
fees
servicing and other fees

Varies with prepayments and defaults: losing high-coupon loans lowers WAC while fixed note coupons stay the same.

A practice question

From the question bank, with the reason each wrong option is wrong.

What additional risk does external credit enhancement, such as a guarantee from a monoline insurer, bring to a securitization?

  1. Lower proceeds for the originator, because junior tranches growWhy not: That is a cost of internal enhancement such as subordination, not of an outside guarantee.
  2. Prepayment risk, because the guarantor can repay the pool earlyWhy not: A guarantee does not change when borrowers prepay.
  3. Counterparty risk on the provider, whose downgrade can lower the rating of the tranche - correct
  4. Variable income, because the guarantee depends on the pool's couponWhy not: That describes excess spread. A guarantee is a promise from a third party.

External support depends on a third party staying creditworthy. If the provider is downgraded, the enhanced tranche can be pulled down with it.

A harder one

A trust holds USD 200 million of loans with a weighted average coupon of 8.2%. It has USD 160 million of senior notes at 4.5% and USD 30 million of mezzanine notes at 6.5%, and the servicing fee is 1.0% of the pool. Annual excess spread is closest to:

  1. USD 7.25 millionWhy not: Omits the servicing fee of 2.0 million.
  2. USD 3.25 millionWhy not: Deducts the servicing fee twice.
  3. USD 14.4 millionWhy not: Deducts only the servicing fee from pool interest and ignores the note interest.
  4. USD 5.25 million - correct

Pool interest 16.4 less senior 7.2, mezzanine 1.95 and servicing 2.0 gives 5.25 million a year, about 2.6% of the pool.

The hardest tier

A securitization has USD 1,000 million of loans supporting USD 800 million of senior notes, USD 120 million of mezzanine notes and USD 50 million of junior notes. Counting subordination and over-collateralization, the credit enhancement of the senior notes as a percentage of the pool balance is closest to:

  1. 17.0%Why not: Counts only the subordination of 170 million and omits the 30 million of over-collateralization.
  2. 20.0% - correct
  3. 25.0%Why not: Divides the 200 million cushion by the senior balance of 800 rather than by the pool.
  4. 3.0%Why not: Counts only the 30 million of over-collateralization and ignores the junior tranches.

Notes total 970, so over-collateralization is 30. Subordination is 120 + 50 = 170. Senior enhancement is (170 + 30) / 1,000 = 20.0%.

In the app: 6 practice questions on this outcome, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.

Start free →

More in An Introduction to Securitisation