Charta is on Google Play: practise on the go. Get the app
Charta

Judge the main parts of the crypto ecosystem, the risks each part can create, and the regulatory measures that could address those risks.

FRM® Part II · Current Issues in Financial Markets · Regulating the Crypto Ecosystem: The Case of Unbacked Crypto Assets · FRM2.CI.6.b

The idea

The crypto ecosystem has several participants, and each creates its own risks. Issuers and developers can mislead buyers, so disclosure and fraud rules matter. Exchanges and trading platforms create conflicts of interest, manipulation and commingling of client assets. Licensing, market surveillance, separation of functions and segregation of client assets address these. Wallet providers and custodians face key theft or loss, so custody standards apply. Miners and validators raise energy use and concentration of control. Lenders and intermediaries create run and leverage risk, which calls for prudential rules. Decentralised finance has no obvious accountable party, so regulators target access points such as front ends, governance and on and off ramps. Links to banks and funds carry risk into the wider financial system. Exam point: match each risk to the participant that creates it and to a measure aimed at that risk.

A practice question

From the question bank, with the reason each wrong option is wrong.

In the crypto ecosystem, which participant is mainly responsible for safekeeping the private keys that give access to users' crypto assets?

  1. A miner or validator who confirms transactions on the network.Why not: Miners and validators add transactions to the ledger; they do not hold users' keys.
  2. The issuer that created and first distributed the token.Why not: An issuer creates and distributes the token; safekeeping users' keys is a custody function.
  3. A smart contract developer who wrote the protocol code.Why not: A developer writes protocol code and does not hold clients' keys.
  4. A custodian or wallet provider. - correct

Custodians and wallet providers hold the private keys, so theft, loss or misuse of keys is their characteristic risk. Custody standards and segregation of client assets address it.

A harder one

A decentralised finance protocol runs on autonomous smart contracts with no company at its centre. Which regulatory approach is most workable?

  1. License the protocol's code itself as if it were a regulated firm.Why not: Code is not a legal person that can hold a licence, post capital or be sanctioned.
  2. Apply rules to identifiable access points, such as front-end operators, controlling or governance persons and on and off ramps. - correct
  3. Exempt it entirely, because with no operator there is no one to regulate.Why not: Treats absence of a visible operator as absence of risk; identifiable access points still exist and users can still be harmed.
  4. Extend deposit insurance to balances held in the protocol.Why not: Deposit insurance covers regulated bank deposits and does not fit a protocol with no insured institution.

Since there is no central operator, regulators look for points where the activity touches identifiable people or the regulated system, such as front ends, parties who control the protocol and fiat on and off ramps.

The hardest tier

A regulator judges that crypto risks have so far stayed contained, largely because links with regulated institutions are small. Which development would most increase the financial stability concern?

  1. Large banks and pension funds taking direct exposures and accepting crypto as collateral. - correct
  2. A rise in energy prices that makes mining much less profitable for miners.Why not: Mining economics can affect prices, but it does not create a channel into regulated institutions.
  3. A fall in the number of centralised exchanges after a wave of consolidation.Why not: Fewer platforms reduce fragmentation and say nothing about links with the regulated system.
  4. Wider retail ownership of coins held without leverage or borrowing.Why not: A consumer protection concern, but unleveraged holdings create little contagion into the regulated system.

Financial stability risk grows when losses can transmit through regulated balance sheets and collateral chains. Direct institutional exposures and crypto collateral are those channels.

In the app: 6 practice questions on this outcome, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.

Start free →

More in Regulating the Crypto Ecosystem: The Case of Unbacked Crypto Assets