Charta is on Google Play: practise on the go. Get the app
Charta

Account for how tokenization works and characterise the core properties of tokenized assets and digital ledgers.

FRM® Part II · Current Issues in Financial Markets · Tokenization and Financial Market Inefficiencies · FRM2.CI.7.a

The idea

Tokenization means recording a claim on an asset, such as a bond, a fund unit or a building, as a digital token on a ledger, so that ownership is held and transferred as ledger entries. The tokenized asset keeps the same cash flows and credit risk as the underlying. What changes is how ownership is recorded, divided and moved. A digital ledger is described by three properties. It is shared, because many parties see one common record. It is programmable, because code (smart contracts) can attach rules such as automatic coupon payments or simultaneous exchange of asset and cash. It is trusted, because participants can rely on the record without relying on a single counterparty. Tokens can be fungible or unique, and fractional. The usual mistake is to assume a token automatically carries legal title. For off-ledger assets, the legal link between token and asset decides what the holder actually owns.

Formulas

Value of a fractional equity token on an asset

token value = (asset value − debt) ÷ N

asset value
the value of the underlying asset
debt
debt secured on the asset
N
the number of tokens issued

The tokens are a claim on net equity, not on the gross asset, assuming they trade at fair value.

A practice question

From the question bank, with the reason each wrong option is wrong.

Which statement best describes the tokenization of a financial asset?

  1. Recording a claim on the asset as a digital token on a ledger, so ownership moves as ledger entries. - correct
  2. Replacing sensitive account data with a random string so that the original data cannot be read if stolen.Why not: Confuses asset tokenization with data-security tokenization, where tokens mask card or account numbers.
  3. Pooling loans and selling tranches of the pooled cash flows to investors through a special purpose vehicle.Why not: Confuses tokenization with securitization, which repackages cash flows rather than changing how ownership is recorded.
  4. Issuing a new digital currency whose value is independent of any underlying claim or asset.Why not: Describes an unbacked crypto-asset; a tokenized asset represents a claim on an underlying asset.

Tokenization represents ownership of an asset as a token on a (typically distributed) ledger. The asset's cash flows and risks are unchanged; only the recording and transfer of ownership change.

A harder one

A bond issuer places tokens on a ledger that represent its notes, with the legal documentation held off the ledger. A buyer asks what the token transfer guarantees. Which answer is most accurate?

  1. A ledger transfer automatically transfers legal title to the notes in every jurisdiction, whatever the documentation says.Why not: Assumes the ledger entry alone confers legal ownership; title is determined by law and documentation.
  2. The token price must equal the value of the underlying note because arbitrage between the two is riskless.Why not: Ignores that arbitrage needs a reliable legal and operational link, and that frictions can keep prices apart.
  3. Tokenization removes the issuer's credit risk because the note is now recorded on a trusted ledger.Why not: Confuses trust in the record with credit quality; the issuer can still default on a tokenized note.
  4. The token is only as good as its legal link to the underlying claim, so enforceability depends on documentation and law. - correct

A token for an off-ledger asset is a representation. Its value rests on enforceable rights over the underlying claim, so legal structure matters. Issuer credit risk and pricing are unaffected by the recording format.

The hardest tier

A fund's shares are held by a custodian off the ledger, while tokens representing them circulate on a shared ledger that shows each holder's balance. The custodian becomes insolvent and the shares are not found. What does the ledger most likely show and mean?

  1. The ledger's consensus would detect the missing shares and freeze the tokens, because a shared ledger verifies the underlying assets.Why not: Overstates consensus: it verifies ledger entries, not the existence of off-ledger assets.
  2. The balances are secure and holders have priority over other creditors, because immutable records establish legal title.Why not: Treats immutability as legal priority; claims in insolvency are set by law and structure.
  3. Balances stay consistent, but that gives no assurance the off-ledger shares exist; the trust problem sits at the custodian link. - correct
  4. Holders suffer no loss, because tokens are fungible and can be redeemed against any other custodian's holdings.Why not: Assumes redemption against other custodians is automatic; the claim is on this custodian's holdings.

A ledger is internally consistent about what it records, but a token on an off-ledger asset inherits the custodian and legal risk. Consensus and immutability do not verify assets outside the ledger.

In the app: 6 practice questions on this outcome, spaced review that brings it back before you forget it.

Start free →

More in Tokenization and Financial Market Inefficiencies